help! bats! everywhere!

"Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not because it has been sober, responsible, and cautious, but because it has been playful, rebellious, and immature." Tom Robbins

Thursday, November 11


Ok, twice a day and every day this week I've been seeing the same woman on the street. At about 8:30 in the morning and 5:10 in the afternoon she's walking on York Mills with her seeing-eye dog*, and she always looks like she's in a bit of trouble with it. Thing is, seeing-eye dogs are usually very focused. They're unflappable. They don't stop to eat things off the sidewalk or bark at people or running off to chase squirrels. Every time I see this dog, it is clearly not acting in its owner's best interests.

I told someone about this and she said, "well it can't be easy for the poor dog!" It's a seeing-eye dog's job to see for the person who walks it! Am I the only person who thinks that a) this dog should be better trained, or that b) this woman just went out and bought a black lab, thinking the ability to see for two is somehow innate?

Notes:
* seeing-eye dog
: The proper nomenclature for the differently-abled and the visually impaired changes as often as my bra size, but does it affect what we call seeing-eye dogs? They're also called guide dogs, but that's a bit misleading (I think of guide dogs barking out facts about Ionic versus Hellenistic style columns in a museum somewhere). Is there a right term and a wrong term?

2 Comments:

At 1:43 p.m. , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here I am again - no you are not the only person who thinks the dog and the woman need training but you ARE the one selected to go up to her and offer to call the place that trained the dog to describe the behavior you witnessed. Good Luck, it is hard to be the chosen one.

 
At 7:06 p.m. , Blogger The Red Fork said...

Call the place that trained the dog! I never would have thought of that. Thank you, Mystery Ethicist, whoever you are . . .

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home